One day National exams where superiority will be judged in detail was yesterday. And this is because the subjects in all three subjects considered – Latin, chemistry and computer science – were considered easy for well-prepared students. The exams went well, without incident.

In particular, candidates of the 1st scientific direction (humanities and social sciences) took exams in Latin, traditionally the easiest of the four subjects. Like commentary on “K” teacher of the textbook “Theoretical education” mr. Tanya Tsirogiannakis, “the Latin theme was clearly articulated and did not present any particular difficulties. Both grammatical and syntactical comments were tolerable and considered accessible to students. The set of observations, although expected, covered a wide range of issues.”

What probably made it difficult for 2nd (positive research) and 3rd (medical sciences) candidates in chemistry was the wide range of topics. “In general, the problems were expected. Compared to last year, this year was easier, but also bigger. Topic A was easy. In topic B, questions were asked that were “worked out”, but there were a lot of them in volume and very good preparation was required. Topic C was simple and required basic knowledge. Questions D1, D2, D3 have been “worked out”. D4 is so complex that you can tell a great candidate from a very good one.” commented “K” teachers of the training course “Education of medical, positive and economic sciences”.

For candidates of the 4th scientific direction (economics and information technology), “the topics were tolerable with several points that required the attention of candidates. For example, in topic 3 there is a function and in topic 2, in B3 the 4th question. Compared to last year, they are easier to characterize,” commented “K” teachers of the training course “Education of medical, positive and economic sciences”.

The general Greek exams for compulsory courses end on Monday for the courses of history (for candidates of the 1st direction), physics (2nd and 3rd) and economics (4th field). So far, the topics – regardless of their degree of complexity – have been clear, without ambiguity and within the framework of the teaching. For only one question on the biology of orientation, the Panhellenic Union of Bioscientists stated that “question A4 has a wording problem, while question C3 allows for a second alternative answer based on the generality of the wording of the question.” In fact, on the A4 issue, there are letters of protest from candidates and teachers at the relevant platform of the Ministry of Education.