At the third hearing today, Manos Daskalakis will again face a mixed jury trial, and her lawyer will appear before him. Roulas Pispirigou who comes with a new wave of questions to his client’s ex-husband.

A witness at a previous trial heard Mr. Kouya publicly refer to him as a “military call” before entering the court, and at the end of the hearing, he was told that defense counsel had said of his presence in court that “he was deplorable.”

Today, Mr. Daskalakis will be called again to give answers to Mr. Kougia, who reverses the Parliament’s statements, claiming that it was not Rula Pispirigou who could not divorce her husband, but rather that Daskalakis was the one he “persuaded”. absolute love for the accused.

From the answers given by Manos Daskalakis during the previous meeting, it appears that he believes that the attempted murder of Georgina was carried out in order for the 34-year-old man to take him back to the family home, and that the murder was to avenge him. for he was absolute in his decision to divorce. Asked about the deaths of his two younger children, who preceded Georgina, the witness told Mr. Kougia that Malena was killed so as not to remain in Athens, where the child, the accused and he, were being treated, in order to be alone in Patras. . As for Iris, the witness said that he believed her mother killed her so that he would be by her side in mourning.

On the part of the 34-year-old woman, her ex-husband’s claims refute the accusation that the death was due to Pispirigo’s “obsession” not to lose him. Mr. Koi’s “reading” is different, as he claims it was his director who had a different relationship with Mr. Daskalakis’ friend and was the one who reacted violently when he found out about it. For defense counsel, the messages he read in court during the previous hearing prove that it was the husband who showed tenderness and love for his client at a time when his two youngest children died and paralyzed Jortina, and not vice versa. around. . Mr. Kougias, after a previous meeting, referring to these reports, stated that “it was completely clear that the one who had an absolute love affair with the accused was Mr. Daskalakis.” The witness himself said that these are some of the reports from that period and that there are others that show the aggression and jealousy of his wife at that time. He also said that these “tender” messages were his hypocritical attempt to keep a low profile so as not to burden Georgina with tension.

In any case, it is the court that will decide which of the two sides is closer to the truth, weighing not only the “bra de fer” between the witness and the defense, but also all the evidence that will be brought to its attention. during the trial.

Source: RES