After 10 months of litigation, the prosecutor of the court where the famous actor is tried for sexual offenses against his young colleagues Petros Philippidisexpanded its position by offering partial justification for the accused actor. The public prosecutor during her documented hearing offered to acquit Petros Philippidis of the charges against him. rape at the expense of a young colleague, offenses allegedly committed in 2008. According to the prosecutor, neither the applicant nor the witnesses interviewed were convinced that Philippidis had actually sexually harassed the applicant (the charges qualify as rape within the meaning of the law). The prosecutor also stressed that the applicant’s credibility was further shattered, as she testified about the second rape much later than the first and when the investigation was already underway, which raises reasonable questions, how could she forget to talk about such a traumatic experience.

On the contrary, prosecutor Stella Stoya asked to be declared Petros Philippidis guilty of two rape attempts against two other young actors, one in his dressing room and one in his car, arguing at length that these accusations, in her opinion, which she has documented, are credible and credible.

The prosecutor was convinced that only the accusations of two attempts at rape were substantiated.

If the prosecutor’s proposal is accepted by the jury, where a specific case is being considered, then the well-known actor, who was in custody but temporarily released on parole, faces a term of less than ten years. , while it is possible that if the court decides to give him a stay of execution of the sentence, i.e. stay out of prison.

Of course, the prosecutor’s proposal does not mean that it is always accepted by the court, judges can decide in completely different ways, but usually, if it is justified, it is taken into account and accepted by the court.