Party officials evaluate the “result” of the debate from different points of view.moreover, opinions about who the winner is – predictably – do not coincide.

government officials after the teleconference, they noted that “Mr. Mitsotakis was clear-cut, cool, knowledgeable” and “answered almost every question”. The same sources stressed that the Prime Minister focused “for a limited time on the future and what he wants to do” while addressing citizens “despite constant attacks from Alexis Tsipras”.

As for the leader of the official opposition, the same sources said that he always started by attacking Mr. Mitsotakis “with well-known stereotypes” such as that he serves “the interests and the people themselves.”

Maximos insisted that the President of SYRIZA not answer the question of which government would do what he says, but to questions about where he would find the money, he generally spoke of dirty self-interest.

Finally, with regard to Mr. Androulakis, it is said that he did not have “a clear position on what should be done in the country, but there were some general proposals that were also not worth it”, while “others tried to appeal to each from their audiences.

From Komunduru they stress that the debate has revealed “why Mr. Mitsotakis has been in hiding all this time” while they focus on questions about wiretapping. “He knew, as all citizens knew, that his answer to the surveillance question would irreparably expose him,” and the statement concluded that “since the lies had ended, Mr. Mitsotakis was forced to call the case a scandal for the first time.” wiretapping.”

In Harilau Trikoupi express their satisfaction with the appearance of Nikos Androulakis, since, as they say, for the first time, Kyriakos Mitsotakis was forced to “declare to the Greek people that the President of PASOK has never posed a danger to national security”, while they appreciate that Nikos Androulakis won over Mr. Mitsotakis and Mr. on Tsipras on three points: trust, dignity and ways of development.

In the Green camp, attention is focused on the specific phrase of Nikos Androulakis: “I am a danger to the New Democracy, so they followed me. What he said is not enough. My goal is to send to prison those who created a semi-state and exposed the country at the international level.”

in the KKE in their assessment, Dimitris Koutsoubas highlighted the differences between the KKE and other parties. As he said after the debate ended, “they … and we are them,” adding that “the parties are not photocopies, they have disagreements.” It is believed that the general secretary of the KKE won with his phrase about the “shepherd’s stripe that Alexis Tsipras scratches”, with which he drew red lines and marked his relationship with SYRIZA.

Kyriakos Velopoulos after the difficult period associated with the Milonakis case, he was perhaps the most “aggressive” in his attempts to talk to his audience. Hellenic Solution believes that he achieved his goal, and the photos he showed, for example, the photo of Panagia Geyza, became viral, achieving maximum publicity.

Finally, Mr. Varoufakis, which received living space recently thanks to “Dimitra”, moved along the same pattern. At MERA25 they appreciated that yesterday this demarcation continued and the different positions of all parties became clear.