Take the security agenda from Mitsotakis, using this slogan to repeat the social inquiry after Tempi, says Alexis Tsipras. Along with “justice everywhere”, which was their campaign project, SYRIZA is considering placing “security everywhere” to signify the failure of the headquarters state to fulfill one of its main promises.

They see in the official opposition that after the accident an “anti-Missotakis” front is being formed, which is now overcoming the “anti-SYRIZA” current from which the 2019 elections were lost. the class was heavily taxed and suffered from the national tragedy in Mati. In 2023, Alexis Tsipras will try to offer progressive management as a solution to get rid of the much-hyped but stigmatized workforce promised by New Democracy and its leader.

In the closed meetings held in Kumunduru, there are many discussions about how the dilemma about the governance model can be updated in the light of the post-tragedy post-tragedy post-tragedy post-tragedy post-tragedy constipation. As for the question of “autonomous or allied governments”, after the fatal accident, SYRIZA will also talk about “managed governments”.

A number of recent initiatives suggest that the President of SYRIZA is trying to fill this gap by widening his appeal to centrist voters: a visit to Bank of Greece Governor Yannis Sturnaras, despite the gap that separates them; the trip to Nicosia and the meeting with the newly elected President of Cyprus, Nikos Christodoulidis, the meeting with Anthony Blinken, even the interviews with the unfriendly media, were designed as actions aimed mainly at a moderate public seeking political asylum. All of this would culminate in the removal of Polakis from the ballot, symbolizing the distancing of SYRIZA and its president from the toxicity of the anti-memorial era.

Along with “justice everywhere”, the slogan is supposed to be “security everywhere”, which is estimated to dominate as a social demand after Tempi.

However, yesterday’s letter of remorse from the former minister, in which he directly apologizes for his incendiary posts and pledges allegiance to Tsipras (“I did not read his interview”, “I did not want to question him”, “I support him with all my strength”), pondered over the leaders of the Komunduru. There have been votes in the party in favor of Polaki’s candidacy on the grounds that she could be a pole of attraction for the anti-systemic vote at a time when it appears to be gaining momentum.

However, Alexis Tsipras took a path reminiscent of Polakis’s practice and, with his decision to personally target the prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Isidoros Dogiakos. From a proposal to arrest him due to a “block” in the ADRA investigations, to a request for the resignation of the prosecutor, since his son, as he mentioned, is the deputy of Kostas Karamanlis. In regular meetings with his legal staff, it has been said that Mr. Doyaku’s behavior does not distinguish between the executive and the judiciary. And this was not helped, allegedly, by a letter from Kyriakos Mitsotakis, in which he indicated to him how the Tempi dossier would be formed, as well as the opening of the dossier on the crash in Adendros in 2017. Alexis Tsipras, however, according to K, one cannot “add water to the wine” in his decision not to participate in the vote in parliament. There have already been discussions about whether, for once, the abstinence that is the culmination of the protest in the surveillance case will end when measures against the relatives of the victims of the railway accident go to the Plenary.

The Tempe tragedy occurred shortly before the election. Reading opinion polls, they see in the official opposition a tendency to turn abstention into a “punitive voice” in relation to the authorities, which can clearly work in favor of SYRIZA. The official opposition may not be able to talk to pensioners and the middle class as much as they would like before the elections, as the situation is quite different. However, the young people who “got off the trains” after the evening of February 28 are faced with the task of “returning to the cars”, following the “train” of Kumundur. Not that turning the anger of youth into politics is a “compass” that does not need systematic, painstaking fermentation and can only be achieved by supporting demonstrations.

It has been proven that everything is not so simple. SYRIZA’s weapon is that she excels at a young age. According to the latest poll by the Nikos Poulantzas Institute, conducted in collaboration with Prorata, in the 17 to 34 age group, 19.6% would vote for New Democracy and 27.7% for SYRIZA. It is obvious that if the Komundur manages to activate this public, even despite a difficult but firm commitment to change the operating model of political parties, it can shake the political balance.

Numbers

21 percentage points is the difference in winning performance between ND (48%) and SYRIZA (27%), out of 35 units that participated in the previous survey (January 2023, N.D. 58% – SYRIZA 23%).

thirty% of respondents would prefer after the elections a devolved government of SYRIZA (14%) or a coalition government with a core of SYRIZA (16%), compared to 37% who would prefer a devolved government of the ND. (27%) or government cooperation with N.D. (10%).

27.7% of young people aged 17-34 would vote for SYRIZA compared to 19.6% who would vote for ND, according to the latest Nikos Poulantzas Institute poll conducted in collaboration with Prorata.