abortion pill threatened with total ban USA: his future decides one conservative judge in Texaswhom opponents of abortion are asking to have his license revoked.

OUR Matthew Kaczmarekwho worked as a lawyer for a Christian organization and was appointed a federal judge by a former US president. Donald Trumpyesterday I heard the arguments of two opposing sides: his government Joe Biden and an anti-abortion group led by the Texas Hippocratic Medical Association, which is suing to revoke a 22-year-old federal license for mifepristone.

Kaczmarek asked the plaintiffs to explain how he could revoke the license for a drug that has been sold in the US for years.

Judge left open the possibility of a more limited decisionallowing the wording to continue but imposing some restrictions that were abolished under the Biden presidency, such as the requirement that mifepristone be given only in person and not by mail.

Kaczmarek vowed to deliver his ruling “as soon as possible,” according to several reporters in a courtroom in Amarillo, Texas.

There may be many things in this case. serious nationwide consequences in the USFor example, the decision of the US Supreme Court in June, when it overturned a historic 1973 decision that protected the right to abortion at the federal level. According to the Guttmacher Institute, 12 of the 50 US states have since banned abortion entirely, while many others have imposed very strict restrictions.

This time, the Texas court ruling could affect all states, even those that protect the right to abortion, and affect the estimated 500,000 women who use abortion pills every year. The plaintiffs ask Kaczmarek to suspend the sale of mifepristone until the case is resolved.

For Planned Parenthood President Alexis McGill Johnson, “the Amarillo case is a reminder to anyone who thought the Supreme Court decision didn’t apply to them” because they live in a state that protects abortion rights.

“Politics is more important than science”

In November, a group of doctors and anti-abortion groups sued the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approving mifepristone, one of two abortion pills.

The plaintiffs accuse the FDA of prioritizing policy over science in drug approval, which they say could cause complications. They also allege that the agency did not follow a proper approval process and did not properly consider the safety of the drug when used by girls under 18 years of age.

The FDA has reported a total of 26 drug-related deaths since 2000, when it was approved, which is 0.65 deaths per 100,000 people. By comparison, aspirin-related deaths are 15.3 per 100,000 people.

The plaintiffs chose to file the lawsuit in Amarillo, a Texas city remote from major urban centers, where Kaczmarek is the sole federal judge.

His profile and his famous anti-abortion stance raised concerns among women’s rights advocates.

“It seems incredible that a mere Texas judge could make a decision that would have consequences for a drug that has been approved by the public health authorities and safely available commercially for over 20 years,” complained Eliza Wells, founder of Plan C Abortion. Information network about tablets.

Such a decision would be “a disaster for women,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said ten days ago.

Since 2000, more than 5.6 million women in the US have used mifeprostone.

Kaczmarek’s decision, whatever it may be, will be appealed to the federal appeals court of New Orleans, also known for its conservatism. The case could eventually go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Source: APE-MPE-AFP-Reuters.