Meeting of the disciplinary board Domoko Prison For social media posts convicted in the Golden Dawn case Ilias Casidiaris it was scheduled for noon on 12 April. Ilias Kasidiaris has previously been reported to be active politically in favor of his “Greeks” party through Twitter, YouTube, Telegram, etc. accounts.

“How Ilias Casidiaris Confessed from Prison” were the headlines of reports published on April 12 and 13. The hearing was adjourned at the request of the defense and took place on May 5. A prison guard, a supervising prosecutor and a social worker were involved.

They unanimously concluded that Il. did not commit a disciplinary offense. “The disciplinary offense of insubordination has not been proven, as it has not been established that he violated the lawful orders of the staff during the conversations in question,” the official document says.

The disciplinary offense for which he was sent was insubordination, as the prisoner allegedly violated an earlier decision by the prison council to restrict his communication. However, at a meeting on May 5, the head of the Domoku prison stated that the convict in the case of A.A. he did not violate the order he received from prison officials, while the prosecutor supervising the work of the prison expressed the same position.

Kasidiaris lawyer, Vaso Pantazis, he noted yesterday during a conversation with “K”. that the announcement published on 13/4 on this issue cg Anti-crime policy was decisive for the outcome of the procedure and the decision of the council. It literally stated that “the competent authorities of the penitentiary system exercise the necessary control over compliance with the terms of telephone communication without any omissions or violations of those established so far.”

At a meeting of the disciplinary board, Il.Kasidiaris filed a memorandum with a request to release him from the charges. However, two years ago, the prison’s disciplinary board decided to limit his communication in connection with reports that appeared at the time, according to which he sent messages from prison. Recently, sources from the Anticrime Policy emphasized that a particular prisoner is talking on the prison phone with his lawyer and relatives, and that it is impossible to control the content of the conversations.