The next “episode” of the Principot case in Mykonos will be written in the courts. As expected, the business side is about to turn against the decision of the Central City Planning Board (KESYPOTHA) and even immediately, trying to “freeze” the process.

The representative of the company is lawyer Michalis Farandos. “We consider KESYPOTHA’s decision illegal. He distorted the law and did not take into account any of our demands,” he says to “K”.. “We will exhaust all legal means to prevent the removal of the Principote. At the moment, 700 people are at risk of losing their jobs.”

The business side will immediately apply to the administrative courts for an annulment of the decision and ask for a temporary injunction, that is, to “freeze” the process until the application for annulment is considered.

Meanwhile, at this time, the quality of life committee is holding an extraordinary meeting in the municipality of Mykonos to decide on the suspension (note: not revocation) of the Principote’s license to operate.

In any case, the issue of continuing the case will be decided in court..

If the business party files an appeal and the court grants a temporary injunction, then this decision will entail the revocation of the operating license, as this will be based on the revision of the Mixed Level conclusion by KESYPOTHA. Thus, the case is necessarily adjourned indefinitely, until the case is heard and a decision is made (let’s not forget that the national elections are in ten days).

If the company’s attempt to stop the process by legal means is not successfulthen the field for the next moves of the administration opens.

First, under the most recent legislation, the Syros Building Authority is required to appoint a private building inspector who will visit the Principote and record whether and what has been demolished/removed (recall that the Principote applied for voluntary compliance from the outset).

The demolition protocol will be amended accordingly, as all urban development violations of the company have been eliminated, with the exception of those that, according to the side of the principality, have been “settled”.

For the final calculation of the fine, the Syros Construction Service must check, as requested, all arbitrary “calculations” of previous years, so that the state can (finally) determine what was legally legalized and what was not. . Then the amount of the fine will be adjusted, as well as the demolition protocol (if the “calculations” were illegal and canceled).

It should be noted that the decision of the Administrative Court of Appeal of Athens regarding the demand of the representatives of Nammos to “freeze” the administrative procedure has not yet been issued.