The public position – which is the first time – is given to her vice president. Supreme Court and the President of the Department, who will be asked to decide whether to run for the party founded Ilias Casidiarischaracterizing the additional regulation made by the government as “photographic”.

The action of Mr. Generic considered unprecedented as he is key to a speedy Supreme Court decision on such a serious matter.

His public stance caused a sensation not only in the judiciary, as this is perhaps the first time that a chief justice has publicly stated before a conference of the Court what he believes, essentially revealing his vote.

“Based on the amendment – addition MINISTRY OF MINISTRYaccording to which steam. 1 article 32 P.D. On 26/2012, a time regulation unprecedented for the judiciary is introduced, establishing a plenary session of the political section of the Supreme Court. unprecedented in that it constitutes a direct interference with the activities of the Supreme Court, since, as in accordance with Article 23 predecessor Law 1756/1988, and also according to Article 27 of Law 4938/2022 already in force: “…Every the department consists of a president and four (4) Areopagites…and not from the totality of the Areopagites serving in it, the number of which, it should be noted, is not the same in all departments, but can be changed by the relevant decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court or, in emergency cases, acts of the President of the AU, which are approved by his Plenum. There has never been a plenary session of a department composed of all its judges. It should also be noted that in the event of an equality of votes in the Plenary section with an even number of judges, since multi-member compositions (Article 4 of Law 1756/1988 and already in force 4938/2022) must have an odd number, an agreement should be introduced (in the union) on the predominance of the opinion of its president.

A provision that is introduced along with the challenged amendment, despite its apparent validity, i.e. “protection of any decision of the Supreme Court” on the declaration or non-declaration of the parties referred to in Article 32 of the AP. 26/2012, so that it cannot be challenged, it photographically captures the distrust and distrust of me on the part of the government, which had the corresponding legislative initiative, regarding the exercise of my discretion in determining the (five-member) composition of the department of which I am president. Are not the hundreds of thousands of decisions of the divisions of the Supreme Court, which are delivered or will be delivered by their five-seat panels, and not by their plenary sessions, not defended and cannot be challenged? The second addition, which A’1 The CA department may request data to document its respective decision from the competent or other authorities, as the case may be, was completely unnecessary, since with the regulation already in force, starting from February last year, the department checks ex officio assistance of the conditions of the application. So, in the context of his ex officio investigation, where could he have obtained data to document his decision? at a nearby grocer?

Finally, it must not escape our attention that MINISTRY OF MINISTRYby announcing this amendment on ERT on Thursday (04.06), impermissibly interfered directly with his judgment A’1 section of the SA, stating, among other things: “There can be no deep contradiction, on the one hand, the criminal justice section (note: he forgot to tell the lower court) to convict him(SS. Kasidiaris) as the leader of a criminal organization, as well as another department of justice, A’1 Supreme Court who says he is a political leader.” This MINISTRY OF MINISTRYindirectly but clearly indicated to his Judges A’1 department, what should be their opinion on a particular issue.

At the same time, prosecutor A.P. etc. Anastasy Kanallopouloswho took over as head of the ELLINES party, Ilias Kasidiaris, sets the tone for what follows with his new statement, as he states: Boridathis not only does not stop us, but makes us even more stubborn to continue the fight!”.

Characteristically mentions Mr. Janerico: “A regulation that is introduced with a controversial amendment, despite its obvious justification, i.e. “protection of any decision of the Supreme Court” from a statement or a non-party referred to in Article 32 P.D. 26/2012, so that it cannot be disputed, it photographically captures the distrust and distrust of me by the government.”

At the same time, prosecutor A.P. etc. Anastasy Kanallopouloswho took over as head of the ELLINES party, Ilias Kasidiaris, sets the tone for what follows with his new statement, as he states: Boridathis not only does not stop us, but makes us even more stubborn to continue the fight!”.