It is expected that the investigation into the circumstances under which he was introduced by the doctor of the Volosskaya hospital will be completed today. sick leave months in head of station Larisaday after tragic accident in Tempe. Yesterday, following the order of Minister of Health Thanos Pleuris, the 5th Health Region of Thessaly and Central Greece requested an urgent administrative sworn examination “to investigate the circumstances and persons through which the head was granted a month’s sick leave.” head of the station Larisa.

The investigation will have to find out whether the inspection was carried out by the inspector of the OSP Larisa, and also whether the information that the sick leave was signed by the doctor on the recommendation of his supervisor and without a diagnostic study to substantiate it is confirmed. As stated in the decision, the investigation, among other things, should be extended to the circumstances in which the sick leave was granted, including examinations carried out in relation to the DCO inspector Larisa, so that the doctor can judge that he should write a sick leave, according to rules of medical science.

“Responsibilities will be divided”

The EDE was instructed to find out whether the interrogation of the ESE inspector Larisa had preceded it.

Minister of Health Thanos Plyuris, speaking on SKAI, said: “I am surprised that immediately after the incident, the person who was indirectly involved in it is a medical problem. And something like that is impossible not to investigate.” He also stressed that if, as a result of the investigation, it turns out that there are no grounds for issuing a permit, then duties will be imposed, and the persons involved will be sent on vacation.” The minister declined to mention the diagnosis on the sick leave, citing medical confidentiality, but reports say the OSE inspector cited back pain.

However, according to Mr. Plevris, the points of concern are that the director of the polyclinic, where the doctor who signed the sick leave, allegedly writes the patient into an outpatient book, in a shift in which he himself is not on duty. . . . It is also reported to give an opinion on the granting of sick leave, although even before the EDE was ordered, no diagnostic test was found to justify the sick leave, which actually had a duration of 30 days from the start. Mr. Plyuris even mentioned that the director of the clinic, who allegedly ordered the sick leave, is also a party candidate in the upcoming parliamentary elections. In an interview with ERT, the director of the clinic said that he did not have a doctor’s office that day, but, knowing about the patient’s previous health problems, he referred him for examination to another colleague of his at the clinic, who worked in the hospital. doctor’s office at the time. He denied that he had given instructions to grant sick leave.