Historian Armand Goshu said on Prima TV that the victim of the attack that happened a week ago should have been Daria Dugina, and not her father Oleksandr, noting that there are several signs of this, as well as the fact that everything would have been created by the FSB, reports News.ro

Oleksandr Dugin and his daughter Daria DuginPhoto: Not provided / WillWest News / Profimedia

On Insider Politic on Sunday, Armand Gosha was asked about the attack in Russia that killed Daria Dugin, but which was allegedly planned for her father, Alexander Dugin, a Putin ideologue.

“I am not convinced that Oleksandr Dugin should have been the victim. Rather, judging by the way things have unfolded over the past few days, I think she’s destined to be the victim. There was that car exchange, but the bomb was planted under the driver’s seat. Dugin does not drive, only his daughter does. There are several pieces of evidence that indicate, including, say, the almost anomalous scenario that the FSB gave us two days later regarding Natalia Vovk, who was allegedly a Ukrainian spy who planned this attack, but who did not stay in Dugin’s apartment, stayed in the apartment with Dugin’s daughter, with Daria. So there are signs that the victim of this attack should have been Daria rather than him,” the historian explained.

He clarified that this attack looks like a theatrical performance in which emotions were sought.

Is the FSB of Russia behind the explosion that killed Daria Dugina?

“At the last moment, he was taken from the car of his daughter, who was driving in front, and transferred to another car, so everything is like a play, the script is written in advance, some emotions are being sought, some emotions are being created, or this thing partially succeeded. If we look only at the Russian press, we will see that it succeeded quite well. At the same time, for the Russian press, but outside of Russia, she managed to quickly dismantle all the scenarios created and submitted by the FSB and the authorities in Moscow,” explained Armand Goshu.

When asked who, in his opinion, wrote this script, Armand Gauchu replied: “That anti-Putin partisan, I don’t think there is such a thing, even if Ponomaryov, a Russian deputy, fled to Kyiv, today a Ukrainian citizen, claimed to have had conferences with the press the other day, at which he told certain details. I didn’t find them convincing.”

“Rather, what you assume at the beginning of the discussion is that it will be the long arm of the FSB. This could be such a scenario. There are several tips, mode of operation. For example, the FSB uses this type of car bombing, with explosives that are detonated by radar. What does it mean? That you planted explosives, taped it to the car, then called and then it detonated. And this is an argument in favor of the fact that it was not about him, but about her from the very beginning. Someone was watching whoever got into that car, not the bomber, we’re guessing, and still blew up the car even though he wasn’t in the car. Oleksandr Dugin is not that important,” Goshu said.