The FRF Disciplinary Committee on Wednesday announced its decision on Florinel Coman after the FCSB player was sent off in the match against Ocellul Galats from the 18th stage of the Super League.

Florinel ComanPhoto: Alex Nicodim/NurPhoto/Shutterstock Editorial/Profimedia

Florinel Coman, suspended for one match after picking up two yellow cards against Ocellul Galatsi

Koman, who had already received a yellow card in the 58th minute, delayed an opponent’s free kick in the 90th + 6th minute and received a second yellow card.

The player left the pitch swearing and many big names in Romanian football called for a two-match ban, accusing him of forcing him to be sent off only to miss the match against Craiova 1948 in the Romanian Cup and be available to play with CFR Cluj from the Super League.

If this was Koman’s plan, it worked: the FRF Disciplinary Commission ended up with a one-match ban and a 740 lei fine.

“FC FCSB vs. ACS SC Ozelul Galati – Removal of Coman Florinel Teodor (FC FCSB) – Pursuant to Article 63.1.g, related to Article 63.2.1. of the DR, the player is punished with a one-match suspension and is subject to sports fine in the amount of 740 lei”, LPF reported.

What the mentioned article provides:

Article 63 – Violations sanctioned by removal (red card) by the referee

1 A player must be sent off by the referee for committing one of the following violations under the “Rules of the Game”: g) receives a second warning during the same game.

2.1. Suspension for one game: for violations provided for in Art. 63.1. ILLUMINATED d), e) and g).

After the derby, “Dynamo” and FKSHB were fined 15,000 lei

Also on Wednesday, the Disciplinary Commission at the FRF made a decision regarding sanctions against Dynamo and FCShB due to incidents from the match of the 17th stage of the Super League.

“SC Dynamo 1948 SA vs. FCSB – Incidents – Pursuant to Art. 82.1 and 3.a and c, related to Art. 83.2.d RD, a sports fine of 15,000 lei was imposed on the “Dynamo 1948” club.

According to Art. 82.2 and 3.a and c, related to Art. 83.2.d of the Republic of Moldova, a sports fine of 15,000 lei was imposed on the FCSB club,” LPF reported.

What the mentioned articles offer:

Article 82 – Responsibility for the behavior of spectators

1. The host club is responsible for the improper behavior of the spectators and, depending on the situation, may be gradually subjected to sanctions in the form of a sports fine and a ban on organizing games at its own stadium or an event to hold games without spectators from 1 to 10 hours. games Depending on the circumstances, the measure of holding games without spectators may be partially applied by prohibiting the occupation of a certain sector of the stand from 1 to 10 games.

2 The visiting club is responsible for the misconduct of its own supporter groups and, depending on the seriousness of the facts, may be penalized in a similar manner to the host club and/or by the banning of its own gallery or its own supporter group at away or neutral ground games from 1 to 10 games. Fans occupying the away section of the stadium are considered to be fans of the visiting team, unless proven otherwise.

3 Irregular behavior includes:

a) introduction of alcoholic beverages, explosive, incendiary and fumigant objects and materials, toxic, hallucinogenic and irritating substances, other objects that were used by spectators to violate public order or may contribute to acts of violence;

c) setting fire to or throwing objects provided for in paragraph 3, let. a), towards other spectators or towards the playing field;

Article 83 – Non-fulfilment of obligations regarding the organization of games

2 Non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of obligations to ensure order and security measures at the stadium, which resulted in:

d) throwing objects provided for in Art. 82, par. 3, let. a), towards other spectators or towards the playing field is punished with a sports fine from 10,000 to 60,000 lei. In the event of a new offense of the same type, the club is punished with a fine increased by ½ compared to the previously applied sanction, until the threshold of 60,000 lei is reached. Subsequently, for each new violation of this type, the club will gradually be subject to sanctions in the form of measures to hold games without spectators, together with a maximum fine of 60,000 lei.

Superleague standings

1. FCSB (goal difference 31-16) 37 points

2. ChFR Cluj (31-18) 32

3. University of Kraiów (26-17) 32

4. Rapid Bucharest (33-20) 31

5. Petrolul Ploiesti (21-17) 26

6. Cluj University (27-26) 26

7. FC Germanstadt (24-18) 25

8. Konstanz lighthouse (27-30) 25

9. Galati Steel (17-17) 23

10. Sepsis Yuriivskyi (19-20) 23

11. UTA Arad (21-25) 22

12. FC Voluntari (24-31) 21

13. Poly Iassi (21-26) 19

14. In Kraiova 1948 (28-33) 18

15. Dynamo Bucharest (9-28) 10

16. FC Botoshani (18-35) 9.