Continuing the theme of wiretapping went to give yesterday about Alexis Tsiprasthe government is responsible directly through the government representative Aki Skertsov. Initially, the controversy concerned the prime minister’s reference to the “telephone wiretapping scandal”, with Mr Schertzos noting that “what I have to say about the prime minister’s reference to the surveillance scandal is that he referred to the article to The Economist and read a specific report in which Greece, according to the Economist, moved up 14 positions in the valuation index” concluding that “the report relates to an Economist publication and does not constitute a political profile.”

Another question concerned her “national causes”. Andrulakis monitoringwhich, according to the Prime Minister, does not exist. Mr. Schertzos “closed” this part as well, stating that “since legal supervision was not ongoing, it follows that there was no question of national danger from Mr. Androulakis.” The government sees an attempt by the president of the official opposition “in the absence of positions to once again instrumentalize the issue of wiretapping on the eve of the elections”, emphasizing that the specific discussion has been exhausted and has embarked on the path of justice.

Assessing the debate, Mr. Mitsotakis noted that “there is a credible proposal to run the country from ND. and on the other hand, “progressive akhtama”.

However, the government is very pleased with the result of yesterday’s debate, emphasizing that it has become clear that New Democracy has a specific proposal, and on the other hand, there is no counter proposal. He said it himself Prime Minister yesterday from Trikala did his assessment. “What did the debate show? That today there is a credible political proposal to run the country: the New Democracy proposal. On the other hand, there is “progressive ahtarmas,” he said.

The most attentive would have discovered that throughout the phone conversation, Mr. Mitsotakis avoided raising his voice and did not attack Mr. Tsipras at all, allowing the conversation between them to reveal Mr. Koutsoubas’ words that “progressive management is nonsense.” Since then, according to government sources, the prime minister has “admitted problems and mistakes” and has preferred to speak to citizens “despite constant attacks from Al. Tsipras”, who, according to the same sources, “answered in general terms”. For Nikos Androulakis, there is a similar assessment that his positions were unclear and “not worth it” and otherwise that “everyone was trying to appeal to their audience”.

The way Kyriakos Mitsotakis conducted the telecombat “photographs” how he will act in the last seven days left before the close of the pre-election period. Maximos Palace is convinced that “the toxicity that Mr. Tsipras is trying to bring back to normal” is far from what the townspeople want to hear and mostly concern the next day. In this context, yesterday Mr. Schertzos returned to the government’s proposal, in which he asked “all parties to refer our economic programs for valuation to one of the following three bodies: the GLC, the Hellenic Fiscal Council or the Bank of Greece” and come in the next parliamentary term ” legislation that would oblige parties to submit their financial programs for evaluation to the Hellenic Financial Council before they are officially announced.”