“A lot of publicity, promotion and advancement has been done in these party formations,” Kasidiaris’s party commented after the “blockade” of the Supreme Court, its spokesman. PASOK-Movement for ChangeDimitris Manzos, in his TV interview on Wednesday morning

After the decision of the Supreme Court to disqualify him Kasidiaris party After the election, Mr. Manzos stressed to MEGA that “we must not forget the cost-benefit weighing that New Democracy has been doing for so many years. In October 2020, the late Fofi Gennimata and K.O. of which I was director, provided the first basis for a legislative initiative on this form.

We have also already pointed out since February of last year the need for real leadership as a criterion that needs to be established in law and delegated to the Plenum of the Supreme Court. Yesterday we were alone again. SYRIZA was also completely absent from the legislative initiative, refusing to retreat, as well as from the Areopagus. Yesterday, the memorandum of the New Democracy mentioned only the party of Hellenes. The EAN party escaped the attention of the New Democracy, and finally its participation in the electoral process was approved.“.

He emphasized that in the PASOK-Movement for Change memorandum, signed by Professor Nikos Alivisatos, “EAN should also be considered a successor organization, since its leader himself clearly described the routes and arrangements with the condemned faces of the Golden Dawn. We insist and have fixed this in our memorandum with a number of instructions. I believe that if the ND had also presented its memorandum with a number of instructions, we probably would have received a different decision yesterday. This is our firm political conviction.”

“There shouldn’t even be a second setting. We have foreseen this very danger since January. And with real leadership, with our proposal, which, fortunately, was accepted, and for the Plenary of the Supreme Court with our proposal, which, unfortunately, was not accepted,” said a spokesman for PASOK-Movement for Change.

At the same time, he appreciated thatin these party formations, a lot of advertising, promotion and promotion was done. Citizens now have the right to vote. Citizens should not be attracted and charmed by supposedly anti-system messages from supposedly anti-system parties.

It is not anti-systemic to support Hitler’s praisers, Fissa’s murderers and immigrants. It is anti-systemic to vote for parties and programs that really want to change the system. Because these extreme formations, after all, support and presuppose the system at the expense of the many,” and concluded:

“We are a party of anti-systemic realism that, through its program, seeks to clash with establishments that do not want reform and social justice. We want Greece to become a strong and fair European country again. This is anti-systemic realism.”

With information from APE-MPE