“Mister. Tsipras and its leaders SYRIZA who are exposed day in and day out ostensibly to protect the labor rights of workers and especially foreign workers, are strongly exposed in the machinations of the head of Transparency, Mr. Raguzis,” the press service said in a statement. New Republic.

It states in detail: “According to today’s publication of the newspaper Parapolitika, Mr. Villa Paros, who has attracted pan-Greek attention with a defiantly luxurious villa that he rents on a 450 sq.m. cosmopolitan island. with a swimming pool and tennis court for 14,000 euros a week and which he defiantly built with a loan from the Workers’ Housing Organization when he was the mayor of Paros – according to the testimony of a working cleaner of Ukrainian origin, it turns out that he acted as an intermediary and “arranged” the verification of her undeclared work, which, as she herself complains, the labor inspectorate at the hotel of his wife’s family, where she worked, recognized her as uninsured.

The head of the SYRIZA transparency department has not given any convincing explanations, only cheap excuses, while he systematically evades declaring his income from the specific place of residence from which he is connected, and continues to challenge the intelligence of citizens.

The ND announcement also emphasizes: “The provocative Mr. Raguzis, with his post yesterday, essentially confirmed the incident and covered up the posting of his former relative who, after confirming the employment of the worker in question at his family hotel in Naousa, Paros, uses the unacceptable term “candidate for workers.”

What does “candidate for employment” mean? Does it exist as a legal term?

Can an “employee candidate” offer her services without her employer insuring her, as she claims? Is this practice compatible with labor law or is it a clear violation of it?

And to be clear. Does the ostensibly supporter of the workers, Mr. Tsipras, accept as political behavior that one of his deputies “settles” the fine that led to the dismissal of the worker, according to her and indeed without compensation, and after she had previously given her documents for work and only was it her sin that she did not lie to the labor inspectors who carried out the inspection, which Mr. Raguzis “arranged” as she was asked?

Despite the incessant revelations, Mr. Raguzis continues to “debunk indifferently.” Will Mr. Tsipras continue to cover for him, as he does to this day, while cutting back ostensibly in favor of workers’ rights?