• Mr. Tsipras, with whom he will form the “government of winners” proposed by SYRIZA.

• Mr. Androulakis, who will be prime minister of the government coalition PASOK is talking about.

• He will note – and there is “consensus” with the ND here – that if a coalition government is formed in the next elections, then the leader of the first party, whether Mr. Mitsotakis or Mr. Tsipras, must be the leader in order to comply with the popular verdict.

• He will attack Mr. Androulakis amid a surveillance case for leaving open a window of cooperation as with the ND if a program agreement is reached. like with SYRIZA. SYRIZA’s main argument is that PASOK is agreeing to collude with the ND parliamentary group. for forming a government when only two of the latter’s deputies publicly dispersed and directly criticized Mr. Androulakis’s monitoring.

In any case, the framework for cooperation set by the PASOK president – cooperation with a politician as prime minister, a program agreement, no to Varoufakis’ participation and a strong double-digit percentage as a condition – caused a lot of discussion inside and outside Harilau Trikoupi. According to the information, Mr. Androulakis wanted to slow down scenarios where the prime minister could be a person from the economy or the banking sector, as a repetition of the “Papademos government” scheme. Harilaou Trikoupi believes that a particular model has become intertwined in the memory of citizens with the period of memorandums, and therefore the relevant literature has cost PASOK dearly.

However, some believe that the scheme presented by Mr. Androulakis regarding the prime minister’s face, and above all the strong double-digit percentage that PASOK must have in order to be part of the government’s decision, could have the opposite effect: cause fears on the part of the electorate about the possible instability of the government and reinforce Mr. Mitsotakis’s narrative of the need to rely on one’s own strength.

The dilemma “autonomy or cooperation” will be one of the main areas of confrontation between Mr. Mitsotakis and Mr. Tsipras during the ongoing long pre-election period: N.D. he is already stressing, recalling the euro, coronovirus, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and energy, that in a period of constant international crises, a solid, independent government is required that can make immediate decisions and will not be the very source of instability. On the contrary, Komunduru has argued in recent months that Mr. Mitsotakis’ own strategy is a recipe for instability, as it could lead the country into consistent election campaigns.

Finally, it is noted that, despite the expected pressure from the Maximos Palace, SYRIZA is not expected to further specify its partnership strategy: it will insist on the position of the progressive government of the “winners” from the first round of simple proportionality. , referring to its form and composition in the results of citizens’ voting on election night.