Mister. Androulakis he does not want to participate in government with her N.D. He believes such a joint government would be politically damaging to PASOK, which some left-wing voters have easily described as a right-wing crutch.

That is why the PASOK leader sets conditions and counter-conditions for such government cooperation – conditions that are essentially impossible to meet and “burn” ahead of schedule such a… unholy alliance.

The latest conditions set by Mr. Androulakis for the joint management of PASOK and N.D. consists, firstly, in obtaining a strong double-digit percentage, and secondly, in order for a coalition government to form (only) after the first elections, simple proportional ones, and not after the second. Thirdly, the Prime Minister should not be Mr. Mitsotakis, but some other political figure that PASOK will propose.

Embarrassed? Very logical. Moreover, from time to time N. Androulakis sets different conditions. But if you think about it, can a second or third party impose a country’s prime minister, depriving the winner of the election from running for office?

And if in practice N.D. not comply with the conditions of Andrulakis? Should we start re-elections with increased proportionality, get a percentage in the region of 35% and not get self-reliance? What will Mr. Androulakis do then? Will he agree to form a government with the ND, leaving the country without government until the results of the third or fourth elections?

And what will be the result of the third election? Obviously lower interest for PASOK, which will be charged, moreover, for leaving the country in a rainy summer.

Unfortunately, the more conditions N. Androulakis puts before the voters, the more he shows that a joint government is unattainable in difficult times. And all the more repels PASOK voters who hate instability and lack of governance.

If, therefore, the voter N.D. thought about voting in the first PASOK elections to send a message of frustration and discomfort to the ND, knowing that on the second Sunday there would be some way for the two parties to cooperate if Mr. Mitsotakis did not achieve self-confidence, now after the Andrulakis, think twice or thrice. And in the end – although undecided – he will have a better chance of voting for N.D. from the first Sunday to prepare Mr. Mitsotakis to achieve legendary independence. So that the country does not remain ungovernable.

N. Androulakis should, instead of setting conditions, follow the call of Simitis that PASOK should be “useful” for the government. And in every possible way to emphasize that PASOK wants, first of all and at any cost, that the country will get a government as soon as possible, doing everything possible to achieve this.

The country is in a difficult situation and needs stability in order to return to normal life and not get involved in adventures again. Moreover, it is an attitude of responsibility that he maintained by voting only on memos when the ND. he talked about Zappea, and SYRIZA turned her back on Europe. He may have paid dearly for his election responsibility, but the bottom line is that he saved the country from disaster.

N. Androulakis shows that he prefers the autonomy of the ND, even with a reduction in the share of PASOK, until he enters the joint government. In other words, he prefers the administration of the country to an independent N.D. despite the co-government of PASOK – ND, in which he, in fact, will have a weighty word and will influence the policy pursued.

There is a well-known axiom in politics: parties say one thing before elections, and do another after elections. And the famous saying: if you can’t stand the heat, stay away from the kitchen.