A new link in the chain of parliamentary pressure on the government for the wiretapping case the opposition adds, taking advantage of the provision of the parliament’s rules of procedure, which provides for the possibility of convening a committee without the right of the majority to prevent it, if 2/5 of the members of a particular committee so require. In this context, and after the request, which coincides with the opposition – the number of their deputies meets the condition 2/5 – the assembly Committee on Institutions and Transparency in order to call her on his case Predator Softwareformer Secretary of the Prime Minister’s Office G. Dimitriadis and Mr. F. Biziou, I. Lavranou and Tal Dilian, who, according to the opposition, are connected through companies with special surveillance software.

It is recalled that certain individuals were involved, including at the request of opposition parties, as witnesses to the commission of inquiry, but N.D. he rejected them. Of particular interest in connection with this meeting is focused primarily on two parameters:

• First, to the extent that they are private individuals and not official agents of EYP and the review is about illegal software, it is estimated that most will find it difficult to raise the issue of “confidential procedure”. The opposition comes forward, arguing that the rally should be public.

• Secondly, it is considered almost certain that the opposition will be asked to comply with the provision (Article 41A §7) of the Rules, according to which “after hearing the persons, the committee may draw up a report. The views of any minority are also recorded in the report. The report may contain judgments on the case that occupied the commission. In fact, it is noted that “the report is submitted to the plenary session, recorded in the minutes of the parliament” and “at the request of the minority, it is included in the agenda of parliamentary control and discussed as a matter of priority in one meeting without a vote.”

According to parliamentary sources, the majority has the right to “block” the drafting of the report and, more broadly, its discussion in the national delegation, citing the argument that the regulations simply provide for the possibility of a report being drawn up (“he can…”). however, seems to be looking forward to a “split” among the “gays” by “photographing” Ms. Olga Kefalogianni and Mr. K. Tsavara, who advocated full transparency in the case: even one of the two “leaks” exists, the correlation changes , as in the Committee of Institutions of 19 members, ten from ND and only nine from opposition parties, and this may lead to the above report.