“Let’s speak institutionally, let a lot of light be shed and the political life of the country not be poisoned.” This Government sources tell K. for the occasion monitoringslowly trying to chart a day after discussing on parliament. The case, which only yesterday, when there was a debate in the plenary session on the establishment of a commission of inquiry to investigate the “case of violation of the confidentiality of the messages of the chairman of PASOK,” has taken an institutional course. AT government We believe that last Friday’s discussion made it possible to draw the following conclusions:

First, the issue has a large institutional background, which needs to be seriously discussed between the parties. Should or shouldn’t the EMP monitor politicians and what are the criteria for doing so? What measures can be taken to prevent a recurrence of phenomena such as the surveillance of Nikos Androulakis, and finally, what steps must be taken to further harm and weaken – critical to national security – National Intelligence Service; This is the focus of the government’s attention, which wants to have a substantive discussion of this issue in the next period. The political climate that will develop is also important for the government. The country, government sources say, cannot engage in a venomous standoff for seven months as it faces “the worst winter in 50 years,” as Ms K. Dora Bakoyannis. In practice, this means that Maximu wants to take flight starting with TIF, where he will focus on the economic package that will be provided in the next period to combat the energy crisis. For Maximos, economic issues are the most important, and they will largely determine how the political scene will shape in the coming months.

At the same time, the government is watching with interest the first measurements that come out after the investigative case, at the same time they are “carrying out” their first ones. The estimates are moderately optimistic. The first measurements show that there is wear and tear from surveillance, but it is not as great as the opposition would probably like. In practice, this means that the situation is manageable as long as two conditions are met: first, that the surveillance case stays here and there are no events, and second, that financial issues are resolved as successfully as possible. As an experienced political scientist told K, surveillance may not be the main issue that worries citizens, but they create an additional “substrate” for “sitting” social discontent. Thus, the goal of Maximus is, on the one hand, to provide an institutional answer to the main issue of monitoring, and on the other hand, to prevent further discontent on other issues.