The experience of such parliamentary committees in the past, the strength of their attitude towards political opponents and, of course, the trust of a narrow leadership core in their person, according to all information and testimony, will be the criteria on the basis of which the persons who will be invited to his staff will be selected. examination committee per follow upthe composition of which is expected to be determined next Monday by the national delegation.

According to converging information, some initial informal discussions in the party headquarters have already taken place, and the final decisions will be announced as soon as the number of members of the commission being created is announced.

Regarding the New Democracy, where a more specific face-picking discussion is expected today, the converging information states that among the dominant ones to form the blue team are: Dem. Markopoulos, both for the intensity of his political interventions, especially against SYRIZA, and for his experience on the Novartis committees and the immediately preceding investigation, which is known to have been launched at the request of an opposition party officer for government funding of media and polls. Dem. Kairides, K. Kiranakis, Wass. Both they and Ms. Aikaterini Papakosta and Zoe Rapti are considered among the best suited to manage the violent attacks that are expected to be unleashed mainly by SYRIZA deputies.

These plans can be confirmed to the extent that Koumunduru’s final choice of who will lead the battle of the extremely tense Examination Board will concern those whose names are already in the background: in addition to T. Xanthopoulos, who “institutionally” answers as head of the Ministry of Justice for SYRIZAWhile he was also present at the media inquiry, there is the choice of G. Ragusis, who is expected to be the party’s representative in parliament at Monday’s meeting. “Institutional” is also G. Katrugalos, while the shock group seems to include such leaders as P. Polakis, Dim. Tzanakopoulos and Chr. Lapp. It’s not just that they are leaders with an extremely dynamic presence, as proven by their participation in previous commissions of inquiry. They are also members of the Committee on Institutions and Transparency, and the SYRIZA leadership might wish to symbolically “link” through them the two committees (on institutions and investigations) that are at the center of intense parliamentary processes.

The main criteria are the strength of their attitude towards political opponents, the experience and trust of a narrow leadership core.

With the same rationale for “symbolism” it seemed to be discussed in PASOK the choice also of a member of the Committee of Institutions X. Kastanidis – according to some reports, he does not want to participate in the exam – although the candidacy of Evangelia Liakulis, who is considered together with Mr. Konstantinopoulos and Nadia Giannakopoulou, they belong to the “presidential” circle. With his “weapons” experience of past committees, V. Kegeroglu also appears as a candidate.

Smaller parties

Of the smaller parties, N. Karatanasopoulos (KKE), V. Villardos with past experience, or K. Chitas (Greek Solution) are likely, while MeRA25, if involved, is estimated to be represented by Sofia Sakoraffa. Recall that according to the Regulations and despite the fact that the examination committee in question will be created – on the basis of the revised Constitution – as the right of the opposition, the majority of its members will belong to the ruling party. This parameter is considered decisive, especially for making a decision, as well as for the time period of the investigation. “The government believes that the Investigative Commission should also conduct an inspection over time,” G. Economou, a spokesman, said yesterday. KKE pointed out – as PASOK did recently – that N.D. he will have to submit “concrete facts and evidence” for the extension he is requesting. Finally, noteworthy is the fact that MeRA25 also seems to point in the direction of increasing the investigation time: “The wiretapping scandal should be viewed as a whole in the context of the authoritarianization of the memorandum state,” the report says. representative of the Mikh party. Kritaridis.