The political forces are preparing for a parliamentary war with many hard-fought battles and a horizon of upcoming elections, in principle having fulfilled the scope of their strategy, while they are now fully prepared for alternative scenarios in the event of a change in the data that now exists in the main release wiretapping and especially in monitoring President PASOK N. Androulakis from EIP.

A procedural as well as a necessary starting point for government and the opposition is considered Conference of Presidents, which, as you know, is scheduled for Monday, as its members are called upon to officially open the Plenary on the one hand for an advance discussion of the agenda at the level of political leaders – unless unforeseen circumstances take place on the following Thursday or Friday – and on the other hand, the convening of the Committee on institutions and parliamentary transparency. With regard to the issue of an organized and methodical investigation at the parliamentary level, it is expected that the next stage will be to develop based on the current data on the contentious case. It is then that the parties will be asked, inter alia, to decide whether to establish a commission of inquiry or, as possible under the regulation, to transform the Committee on Institutions and Transparency into an investigative body with powers and functions similar to a “traditional” commission of inquiry.

The starting point for power and opposition is the Conference of Presidents, on Monday it is possible that the Committee on Institutions will turn into an Investigative Committee.

The blue majority and the opposition have agreed in principle to look into the wiretapping case, but each side enters the field with different goals and plans. The key “splinter” at the moment is the time period of the parliamentary investigation.

The ND, which for the first time in its time in government is on the verge of breaking with all opposition parties on a serious political issue, seems eager to conduct an in-depth investigation of the past, including the period of governance SYRIZA, least. The ruling party is not entirely alone in this position. On the one hand, there is the CHRG, which, recalling vague cases of collusion in the telephone hub of its offices in Perissos back in 2016, says that its own case should also be investigated now. On the other hand, PASOKwho sees that the leadership of SYRIZA is trying to act as the dominant opponent of the government and in this case, is not opposed to a temporary expansion of the investigation, as long as, as was said, ND. provide the Committee on Institutions with sufficient evidence that such a “dive” into the past is worth it.

At the same time, Harilau Trikoupi insists that the aspect of the illegal Predator software be included in the scope of the investigation.