In full swing, despite the summer heat, its research is underway. Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court about how secret state documents on surveillance of specific individuals were leaked, while the prosecutor’s office is conducting coordinated investigations into complaints of wiretapping, both from the president PASOK – KINAL N. Androulakis as well as from a journalist T. Koukakis. The prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Isidoros Dogiakos, is personally investigating the leak of documents, in connection with which the journalist was summoned yesterday and testified Thassos Tellogluwho has long since made revelations about the surveillance of journalist Thanasis Koukakis, as well as the existence of illegal software that was used to monitor people.

The journalist, as it became known from judicial sources, in his testimony did not give information about how and by whom the leaks under investigation were committed, but spoke in detail about journalistic revelations and about illegal surveillancegiving them a timeless dimension. He reportedly stated that surveillance had been conducted – and reported in the past – since 2015, but was unable to identify the perpetrators because, he argued, the current 2021 law, which is retroactive, significantly impedes any investigation.

The journalist gave a timeless dimension to the problem of surveillance.

In addition, as he confirmed in his statements after the end of his testimony, in the prosecution he spoke about trying to acquire illegal software in the past, when he was also asked about his position, that in 2018 the current prime minister was also a victim of surveillance. Tasos Telloglu, he said, testified that “the phone of the then official leader of the opposition was not protected.” About it ad N.D. he stated that “he must provide specific information to the prosecutor of the Supreme Court”, and added: “We are not going to enter into any logic of compensation.”

The journalist also added that people who were under surveillance in the past are still being monitored now, and when asked if he knew if other political figures were victims of surveillance, he answered in the negative, but stated that he was aware of other non-political figures, but without naming them. In any case, the journalist separated the current situation of surveillance from the past, noting that the difference is that legal surveillance is now combined with illegal surveillance.

However, the Supreme Court prosecutor’s investigation is not expected to be completed any time soon as Mr. Dogiakos orchestrates his actions to shed light on unknown aspects of the case, which has sparked political confrontation and fears over the rule of law and the protection of citizens’ rights. .