What the result of May 21 could change in his strategy Kyriakou Mitsotakis and in the way his president moves New Republic; At first glance, it seems – and indeed it is – that the central strategy does not change, since it was it that allowed to achieve an important result on May 21. However, a closer look at how Mr. Mitsotakis moves reveals that some details have changed. First, as far as his tour and how he takes over the campaign, the president of New Democracy moves exactly as he did the first time. elections.

Be that as it may, the New Democracy campaign was very personal from the start, as all qualitative research showed that Kyriakos Mitsotakis had an advantage over Alexis Tsipras in all areas. The same tactic continues today: the president of New Democracy continues his tours with the same intensity and frequency, and there are also many TV appearances on the menu in the same sense as we saw them before May 21st. Presence, that is, in many non-political shows with casual content, such as yesterday at Mega’s breakfast.

But there are also areas where there has been a shift. For example, prior to May 21, Mr. Mitsotakis inevitably made several references to SYRIZA and PASOK as part of the strategy was to deconstruct his main adversaries. The result of the first election was so revealing that he is inevitably more concerned with his own party and how to convince everyone who came to the polls on May 21 to repeat it than SYRIZA and PASOK, with references to the two parties it is now with a drip.

Mr. Mitsotakis limited his references to SYRIZA and PASOK in the latest round of new polls.

In the same logic, the pre-election behavior of the former prime minister testifies to even greater self-confidence, since the victory is finally decided and the stake is only on achieving self confidence and the range it will have. “A difference of 21 units inevitably gives a different look, not accompanied by the slightest arrogance”, says “K” “blue” strain.

Interpretation

However, the biggest difference between the “first round” of elections and the current electoral process is that there is now a fixed result that reflects the trend of society. In Piraeus, the way they read the result is crystallizing: they see the May 21 vote as a strategic defeat for populism and a clear order to “run ahead.” In this context, they focus on the reforms and changes that need to be made in the next four years. Mr. Mitsotakis, appearing yesterday at a breakfast in Mega, repeated twice the big bet on reforms.

In terms of competitive advantage, Piraeus focuses on reliability and delivering on promises within four years. “This is perhaps the most basic difference that influenced the outcome of the elections on May 21,” says in “K” “blue” source. He added that not only Alexis Tsipras has trust issues, but also Nikos Androulakis, who described all his offers as “free”.