Announcement about his “blocking”. Supreme Court party of Ilias Kasidiaris, but also the green light received by the Honorary Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Anastasios Kanellopoulos, issued by PASOK-KINAL.

Leaving the dots to New Democracy and SYRIZA, Harilau Trikoupi argues that if the party’s proposal for a unified memorandum had followed, “perhaps our legal position regarding the instructions to ban the participation of the IF party would have been much stronger. “.

PASOK – KINAL Announcement in Detail

“We respect the decision of the court.

We must note, however, that if our proposal for a single memorandum of the parties of the democratic arc, which would cover both the “Greeks” party and the “EAN” party, were carried out, as we requested in our own memorandum to the Supreme Court, perhaps , our legal position on the evidence regarding the IF ban was much stronger.

Unfortunately, PASOK-Movement for Change was the only one in this quest to defend democracy and institutions: the ND, in its own multi-page memorandum, did not ask for the non-origin of the EAN party, and SYRIZA did not even submit a memorandum to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court decision

By nine votes to one, the party founded by the convict, a former member of the ASA, Ilias Casidiariswas reduced by the upcoming elections.

However, the EAN party, founded by the honorary Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Anastasios Kanellopoulos, passed the legality check. The decision was made unanimously by all ten members of department A1.

For the EAN party, in its memorandum, PASOK demanded that the real relationship between Kasidiaris and Kanellopoulos be examined, which was done ex officio by the court, highlighting the fact that Mr. Kanellopoulos, before deciding to apply as leader of his party, IF he publicly stated that he would lead the party of Casidiaris, which ultimately did not happen.