Regarding the possibility of participation of convicted leaders A.A. In the elections, the Delphi Economic Forum appointed the prosecutor of the Supreme Court, Isidoros Dogiakos, emphasizing that “AA with evidence was condemned as a criminal organization”, at the same time he asked with an emphasis: “A party burdened with murder can be represented in Parliament”?

The statement of I. Dogiakos acquires additional significance, since it was the prosecutor of the Supreme Court who prepared the proposal to impeach political workers A.A. and on this suggestion the decision was based to take them to court.

Supreme Court Prosecutor, citing recent criticisms he has received for not intervening to investigate complaints from resigned Supreme Court Vice President Christos Tzanerikos amid government regulation to increase the number of judges who will judge the party’s electoral fate Casidiaris, replied that the prosecutor of the Supreme Court would intervene when he saw fit. However, he added that if any criminal act had been committed, Mr. Tzanerikos, an excellent lawyer, could have convicted him himself, which he did not.

Regarding the criticism he has received for his handling of the surveillance case, Mr. Dogiakos denied that he interfered with the work of ADAE and its investigation into Cosmote, stressing that all he did was spend minimal time on ADAE’s investigation into Cosmote because a law passed by the government that changes some of the data was only six days old and needed to be studied.

In any case, I. Dogiakos, answering questions, testified that the prosecutor’s investigation of surveillance, according to him, is at a very advanced stage and developments are expected, and he stressed that any delays are not related to the negligence of the three prosecutors conducting the investigation , but requests for legal assistance have been sent overseas and responses are pending. These answers, he stressed, have not yet been sent, despite persistent pressure from competent prosecutors.

Also in relation to the wiretapping case, he stressed that he consulted with his “wise” predecessors as well as current colleagues regarding the legality of the detention, stating that there is no difference between his opinion and the new current EYP law, but only who will have the final control, ADAE or EYP.

I. Doyakios also spoke about the difference between the mentality of a politician and a prosecutor, emphasizing that many politicians have an opinion that they stubbornly adhere to. “What worries me most is that many, and sometimes call on citizens, to disrespect court decisions,” he added, referring to political expediency, which, when interest dries up, the case falls aside.

The Supreme Court prosecutor described the problem of the judiciary as multifactorial, believing that the newly planned assessment will improve the work of judicial officials.

Finally, answering the question of what he would do after the end of June, when he retired, he said that he was ready, like a mere mortal, to submit to the forces of time.