“Is adopting the arguments of the fascists a cover for fascism?” he asked his ward. SYRIZA Minister of Internal Affairs Makis Voridis, – said the leader of the official opposition Alexis Tsipras. “To get rid of the gravity of this struggle (…), you have only one way: to join us in achieving the strategic goal and vote for the position, otherwise you will remain in great danger,” said Mr Voridis.

Emphasizing that the meeting of G. Gerapetritis with the judge of the CA “in order to discuss organizational and procedural issues related to a particular case and the implementation of a particular provision, is absolutely legal, normal and mandatory”, he said that Al. Tsipras developed the victim defense argument. In fact, he stressed that Mr. Tsipras today mentioned for the first time the allegation that the existing provision violates the Constitution and that this provision comes into force after the meeting, since it is found to be unconstitutional.

He also said that Al. Tsipras went further that here we can have a violation of human rights and the country will be exposed. “They didn’t get that far either.” Why did you come and accept this selling point at such a critical time? To justify not voting for a position? asked the Minister of the Interior, and continued: “Do you hold that view?” So, do you agree with the opinion that this legal paradox should be blocked, not to say unacceptable, for criminals to act as leaders of political parties?

Are you helping in this way because we have a common strategic goal, or are you blinded by campaign targeting or specific audience targeting? In the anti-system blur, rage, rage, indignation? The dilemma is clear and Mr. Tsipras’ argument makes SYRIZA’s position difficult: “After this argument, to get rid of the weight of this argument and argument, you have only one way: to join us in the strategic goal and vote for the provisions, otherwise you will remain in great danger,” concluded Mr. Voridis.

Source: APE/MEB