Firstly, the question of wiretapping has been answered many times and therefore cannot be the central topic of discussion. OUR Kyriakos Mitsotakis he also noted during his speech in Heraklion, Crete, when he announced that the discussion would be broader in order to “learn a lot”, noting that “regarding the subject of the famous wiretapping, we have already taken a stand, frankly, “because” we have taken on our responsibilities, we have changed our face, we have voted for a modern EYP operating structure.”

OUR second axis in which the prime minister will move has to do with the comparison and actions of the two governments, which is a key part of his strategy. For this reason, information from Maximos Palace they say Mr Mitsotakis will refer extensively to the rule of law, which has been made the flag of the opposition SYRIZA. This will not be the only area where there will be a comparison, as, as expected, Kyriakos Mitsotakis wants an in-depth discussion. Therefore, there will be extensive references to the economy and foreign policy, as well as to the issue of immigration, with the case of “little Mary” proving, according to government sources, how the official opposition is politicizing.

OUR third axlewho will play a leading role is the future and what is planned for the next four years. “I want citizens to overcome this cloud of toxicity, highly polarized political discourse, and finally realize who they really are, who can talk to them about their future,” Mr. Mitsotakis said in a recent speech in Heraklion, trying to run forward. .

The three axes along which the Prime Minister will move – The President of SYRIZA will insist on the issue of monitoring.

official opposition

Per Alexis Tsiprasintercepts and the results of her investigations ADAE this is the main canvas on which his speech today is based. its president SYRIZA it is clear that he will insist and urgently ask the prime minister so that he can explain to the Greek people what is the reason for national security, why the minister of energy and the leadership of the army had to be put under surveillance. He will talk about the confirmation of the work of the semi-state mechanism, which is now coming in the most official way, from the Independent Body, which is constitutionally guaranteed to ensure the confidentiality of communications.

According to the President of SYRIZA, democracy has been seriously damaged and Kyriakos Mitsotakis has a responsibility to the Greek people. Responding to the majority’s line of defense that the prime minister was unaware of these connections, the official leader of the opposition will testify that whatever the reality is, it is equally gruesome.

“Either he knew, so he should retire, or he didn’t know and had to retire again because he wasn’t capable of controlling the EYP he took over.” The Prime Minister stressed from Crete that “I am not looking for conflict, I am looking for comparison.” According to the information, the gauntlet is expected to be taken by Alexis Tsipras, referring to what SYRIZA put before New Democracy in 2019, unlike the situation the country is in today.

Toxic confrontation, extreme expressions

Widespread toxicity and pavement expressions that were heard several times marked from the first moment a special meeting of the National Delegation on the vote of no confidence submitted by SYRIZA to the government. The picture and atmosphere in the House of Commons on Wednesday afternoon can only be attributed to the worst pages of Parliament’s post-colonial history.

The indignation of the first vice-speaker of parliament Nick. Kaklamanis, as recorded with the words “shame on us? Is this parliament? in one of his speeches, at some points when the confrontations seemed to get out of hand, it is indicative of the climate.
There were, of course, periods when the level of secular parliamentary dialogue and confrontation with political characteristics persisted, but they “drowned” in the general atmosphere of extreme polarization. These include several leadership positions both in the government and in minor opposition parties, with the latter even condemning the extremes in which members of the K.O. N.D. and SYRIZA.

Among the notable features of the “soft zone” of political dialogue are the self-critical moods of cabinet members: “We are not the first infallible government in the post-colonial era, but we are certainly a government that, more than ever, I would say, is learning, moving, improving , produces. Exactly the same thing has happened to the subject of this discussion since last summer. It is much better to have a government that makes mistakes and learns from them than the wrong government,” said Mr. Pierrakakis, Minister for Public and Digital Governance. “No one has ever claimed that we are an infallible government, this is the prerogative of others. The classic error case is what we’re discussing. But the balance of the government is more than positive,” Minister of Labor K. Hatzidakis said. “Of course, there are and always will be mistakes and omissions, and we do not claim any infallibility, as perhaps in other ideological areas,” Foreign Minister N. Dendias said.

Against this style of position, the official opposition almost without exception had to fend off sharp attacks directed personally at the prime minister, and with references to a regime that had nothing to do with democracy. “We must defend the Constitution. We have to defend democracy in order to protect the main thing, the opportunity to live in a democratic society,” said Mr. D. Tzanakopoulos. Mr. N. Pappas spoke of “the rape of institutions.” Mr. P. Skouroliakos spoke of “attacks by the extreme right.” “You have become a principled party, an ultra-right faction,” said Mr. K. Barkas.

On several occasions, SYRIZA also made the allegation that the ND deputies were being blackmailed by the Prime Minister, which provoked a reaction from the presiding Nick. Kaklamanis: “Since the historian of the future will be reading the minutes of the parliament, I want to say that not a single Greek MP will vote by blackmail. It is a shame to say such things in Parliament.”

As if that weren’t enough, Mr. K. Barkas and Mr. P. Polakis talked about the courts that would be created for the leaders of the current majority.
The bureau also made harsh remarks to the workers’ deputies, the most typical of which is a reproach to the deputy K. Maravejas, who, commenting on the attacks of the SYRIZA deputies, spoke of “political monkeys who scream and think that we will be afraid of them this way” . Finally, Mr. Kaklamanis made stern remarks about behavior not in accordance with the rules of the Parliament, among other things, Mr. Adu. Georgiadis and D. Markopoulos.