Home Politics Theory: Two Views on Elections

Theory: Two Views on Elections

0
Theory: Two Views on Elections

Mitsotaki’s disgust for the election

Despite the vertical rejection of relevant scenarios, I learn that the recommendations for an earlier-than-expected election appeal remain strong for the prime minister. The most experienced, however, noticed that the day before yesterday, during a speech at the Political Committee, the Prime Minister, regarding the elections, stated that “the pre-election period for the 2023 elections began on July 8, 2019”, without in any way mentioning this time that the elections take place at the end of what many saw as an election “window” in the early months of 2023.

Two “schools”

Inside and outside Maximus, there are two “schools” on the subject of elections. The first one calls for “immediate elections”, since, on the one hand, the toxicity of the climate has exceeded all expectations and it will not go like this until April, and on the other hand, the issue of wiretapping citizens at this stage is not as worrisome as before. one might expect, leading to North Dakota, despite wear and tear, holding onto its bets. Another school says that “no issue can remain at the forefront of the news for long” and by spring the political agenda will also include issues that the ND wants to highlight, such as developing the economy despite adverse conditions, significant sums that have been given to the weakest , on national security, on large projects and on the digitalization of the state.

A simple announcement from PtD

With an unnecessary statement, the President of the Republic responded to a joint letter from POESY and journalistic associations on the case of wiretapping, stating that on this issue “she took a position of principle and clearly within her powers under the Constitution, and the case is now in the judiciary.”

No privacy

The position of Olga Kefalogianni, who is a member of the Parliamentary Committee on Institutions and Transparency, and who recently insisted – in view of the convening of the Committee on Institutions and Transparency – that “the issue of confidentiality can no longer be raised in the committee.” cannot go unnoticed.” He added that especially in this particular committee, “which, under the Rules of Procedure of Parliament, has the right to control, confidentiality cannot be invoked.”

Author: Stavros Papantoniou

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here