A government representative spoke about the innovations of the draft law “Procedure for removing the secrecy of communications, ensuring cybersecurity and protecting personal data of citizens”, as well as about broader progress in wiretapping, a government representative spoke in a radio interview with the SKY radio station. 100.3 inches Yannis Oikonomou.

First, he mentioned two, in his words, “very interesting events.”

“First of all, Mr. Manzurani, stating at the beginning that there is really no facts and evidence of what the official opposition and various forces around SYRIZA claim, he then photographed a repetition of the Novartis case. He again mentioned some supposed sources who, if they put on their hoods, will be able to say things that I think are no less plausible and serious than what they said in the case of Novartis. The correlation is so obvious that it betrays, I would say, systematic and thoughtfulness on his part. SYRIZAabout how the whole thing developed. The second concerned the lady’s revelation Photius in parliament that there are centers that, due to the fact that the government does not cut and sew according to their standards, perhaps Recovery Fund and NPF, defending the public interest, launched such an attack on the government. And a key part of this plan, this attack, is the wiretapping story. These are the words that Ms. Fotiu herself said yesterday,” said Mr. Economou.

At this point, he emphasized that “the interest of the whole case is that this kind of interference, I would say, takes place at a time when the judge’s investigation into this case is ongoing. We said from the beginning that as the judge’s investigation progresses, every aspect of this wiretapping case will be highlighted, what should be covered, and no shadow will be left. Justice will be served, the true scope of this case will be revealed, and with the help of all those who are truly interested in knowing exactly what happened, those who committed criminal acts will be punished, and those who are trying to give the case a different dimension will be punished. punished. be exposed to attack the prime minister and the government.”

He also stressed that the government has said the same thing from the very beginning and is firmly following the same line. “We support Justice with all our might. We protect the Greek state even more with the agreements that we made yesterday for public consultations. And we are talking about very important and significant interventions in what concerns the EMP, its nature, the qualitative characteristics that its commander should have.”

“We have categorically stated that The Greek state did not conduct any negotiations with the companies producing this malicious software. and no security agency in our country has used this malware. I repeat our categorical position that not a single state security agency in our country has purchased or used malware. There is no evidence, other than a number of guesses, which some even use to draw arbitrary conclusions.

But I want to be clear. We have no information that these were political figures under surveillance. There is no such information. We have no information or indication that this was the case.

Thanks to the institutional interventions that we made yesterday in the public consultations, mainly on the issue of politicians, our government is approaching and is currently doing very, very much. strict specifications and conditionsto begin the process of legally binding a political entity. And the two prosecutors, before we get to the prosecutor, must get permission to start the process from a state factor of increased prestige and wider recognition, such as the chairman of parliament.

What we’re doing is being very, very strict about any possibility of political surveillance in the future. The problem, which also arose in the case of Mr. Androulakis, and which the Prime Minister recognized from the first moment, is that we needed many more filters. These filters that we have put in now are that, first of all, where there was a prosecutor giving permission, we added from the very beginning a second prosecutor, the deputy prosecutor of the Supreme Court.”

He even explained that “the chairman of the parliament was added because he is a state factor of increased prestige, a state factor that in recent years has been elected not by the votes of the party of the parliamentary majority, but more widely” and noted:

“The President of Parliament will be able to weigh whether the evidence at his disposal, recommendations, files, those that seem to pose a threat to national security, are so immediate, so strong, to give their permission, in the order of decision by the prosecutor’s office.