Assessing the testimony of forensic experts interrogated as witnesses (for prosecution and defense) in the murder case Alki Campanu, The prosecutor of the mixed jury in Thessaloniki, where the sensational case is being considered, continues his speech from the very morning.

Prosecutor Kyriaki Kleaba supported the conclusion of the medical examiner Ledas Kovatsis, to which she commented that she was criticized by the defense of the 12 defendants, “as if she was referring to conjectures and arbitrary conclusions.” However, he was successful against three forensic technical consultants who, depending on the case, testified on behalf of the defendants, accusing them of “contradictions and attempt to mislead the court.”

“Their conclusions and their judgments are far from our case. They testified in a way that was convenient for the defendants,” he said, adding that they made “serious mistakes” by comparing their convictions to injuries in a fight. “But here we are talking about the battlefield, the fan war,” said Ms. Klyaba.

She reiterated that it was a cowardly and barbarous attack in which all the defendants displayed unbridled violence, merciless hatred and animal apathy. Their goal was “to take as many lives as possible from the eternal enemy,” the prosecutor said.

Commenting on the wounds on Alka’s lower limbs, K. Klyaba stated that they were inflicted with a knife, folding gloves, a hammer and scissors, while she called these blows inhuman. As for the head injuries, he said that their intensity was such that one could be sure that the victim would eventually turn up. “It was as if the ball had been kicked in the field,” he said, describing as a myth the second defendant’s claim that the fatal blow, which he, by his own admission, inflicted with a knife, was inflicted on the right thigh. , causing the femoral artery to be eaten away.

The purchase of K. Kliabas is ongoing and will probably not be completed today. Her proposal is written and has over 600 pages.

Source: RES