There are only a few hours left before her meeting. Central Committee from SYRIZA (17:00), one of the most critical Kumunduru internal party meetings in recent years, after a heavy defeat in the May 21 elections, and thorny pre-election road until the second vote, exactly one month from today.

With data generated last Sunday, it would not be an exaggeration to say that this is an assembly that acquires existential features for the official oppositionas a new narrative with which the faction will march in the next 30 days is in search, but the first signs of the next day are yet to be seen, in fluid – as at least predicted – ground more widely in the centre-left area.

The statements that have been recorded in the last few days, however, radiate a climate with different signs. There have been statements that have added fuel to the fire, such as Dimitris Papadimoulis’ statement (which prompted a sharp reaction from Rena Douros and Nikos Pappas yesterday), others with a self-critical attitude (but also harsh), such as that George Tsipras, on Monday, but they are recorded and mitigation interventions.

A message of unity from Ahtsioglu and Kharitsi

OUR Efi Ahtsioglu And Alexis Haritsis — two of the three people who, according to Dimitris Papadimoulis, need to be “used” along with Alexis Tsipras ahead of the June 25 elections, sent a clear signal of “appeasement” and unity.

Ms Ahtsioglu clarified in an interview with Kokkino that “SYRIZA led by Alexis Tsipras. Any discussion that attempts to question this is taken out of context, invalid and offers nothing”, while Mr. Haritsis in his ERT interview noted that “more seriousness is required in how we position ourselvesand that “we are in an extremely critical situation.” The latter, also addressing Kokkino, stressed: “SYRIZA must march as a united front under the leadership of Alexis Tsipras” and called on “everyone to rally around the chairman of the party.”

However “Papadimoulis proposal» has been criticized on the merits and George Varemenos, who stressed to Mega: “I wish it was that simple, take two or three faces and show them. The issue is more complex than such proposals suggest. The problem is that there is no time to think. I could tell you so much right now. But I won’t tell because now is not the time. There is no time for such fruitless confrontations.”

… after Christ the prophecy of Antonaros and the future of Tzapanidos

Her own “explanation” of the electoral defeat also provided Theodora Tsakriwho calculated that the SYRIZA communication campaign should focus more on the personality of Alexis Tsipras

At the same time, his intervention yesterday caused a sensation. Evangelos Antonaros, who – speaking in Attica – “confessed” that he “sees the difference” between N.D. and SYRIZA, but he decided to express himself differently publicly, “because I was part of the party and I had to encourage, give hope to warm the people who come.”

At the same time, the reaction of the Secretary of the Political Committee of the New Democracy, Pavlos Marinakis, was also caused by the statement of the journalist and former minister of the government of SYRIZA, Nikos Khidakiswho, in a conversation with Contra, expressed the opinion that “perhaps, in part of the population, in confusion, misinformation and fog in the mind, there is a syndrome “we are the gatekeepers of the night”, “Stockholm syndrome”. ‘”.

In fact, for younger voters, N. Khidakis said that “either they themselves did not understand, or their parents did not understand.”

“Now that young people have also voted for New Democracy, according to Mr. Khidakis, they either suffer from Stockholm syndrome or do not understand what they voted for,” the secretary of the ND Political Committee states in his statement-response. .