The first agreement between them, so far the only one, at least in the pre-election period, was informally reached yesterday Mrs Mitsotakis And Al. Tsiprasin connection with the Prime Minister’s proposal for their TV duel before the second election, in case the May 21 polls do not form a government.

“In the next elections, since there is indeed a bonus, and the bonus is about the first two, of course, there should be a debate,” the ND President (ANT1) said characteristically. and continued: “In the next election, in which the question of ‘who will rule the country’ will become much clearer, everything will become much clearer.”

A little later, when the President of SYRIZA was giving a TV interview to another channel (Open), he was informed about this proposal of the Prime Minister and asked to express his position on it.

Mr. Tsipras testified that he accepts Mitsotakis’s reasoning: “If we go to repeat elections, it’s a bad lie, they will have the character of a referendum. Either Tsipras or Mitsotakis. It will be a painting,” Mr. Tsipras specifically said.

It is noteworthy, at the same time, that when the objection was brought to his attention by PASOK Executive Director M. Karchimakis, that even then there should not be a televised duel between Mitsotakis and Tsipras, but that N. Androulakis should also participate, since PASOK is still will be a regulator in a possible government of cooperation, since theoretically this is not a given even after the second election and self-confidence, the president of SYRIZA limited himself to a caustic comment: “It is necessary to remember the position of the regulator in order to make the right choice and pave the way for the government between 21 and 28 investigative orders will be terminated.”

However, the first estimates of the headquarters show that none of the other parties will agree to such a televised duel between two elections.

As for tomorrow’s debate, which will include all the political leaders of the parties that have had parliamentary representation over the past four years, Mr Mitsotakis rejected the claim that it would be just “parallel monologues” and added, among other things: “There is a question that needs to be raise during the discussion. How exactly progressive management is perceived by all participants. Since they will be with us, are they not already explaining to us exactly how this progressive management will work?”