Objections submitted by representatives Principot And Nammos. In the first case, the board decided to finalize the report on the autopsy of most of the corpses. lawlessness, while some that are considered “fixed” will be tested. In the second case, KESYPOTHA ruled that the company had no right to appeal at this stage of the procedure. Earlier, the Tripartite Court of Appeal in Athens suspended until Monday its ruling on Nammos’ application for an interim injunction, which would mean a “freeze” in the process.

The two cases were discussed yesterday at a marathon meeting where the board was asked to consider all the arguments of the two companies. According to the information, the legal team representing the principate sent new ones to the council in previous days. “settlements” of urban violationswhich were not brought to the attention of the inspectors during their inspection. However, after examining the “arrangements”, it was found that they were not consistent with aerial photographs and therefore they were rejected. KESYPOTHA, however, has ruled out “arrangements” that have been made in the three buildings to be inspected either by the Building Authority of Syros (where Mykonos is located) or environmental inspectors.

For the rest (except for three “villages”) urban planning offenses, the autopsy protocol Environmental inspectors will become final. This will make up the bulk of the €22 million fine imposed by the inspectors.

Then, given that the Principate has told the city planner of Syros that he is going to voluntarily demolish part of the arbitrariness, the city planner should appoint a private building inspector (of course, it is possible that this will eventually be appointed environmental inspectors) to verify that he finally destroyed.

When this showdown is completed, the penalty (which will be reduced depending on the demolitions) is finalized and awarded. At the same time, the objects are classified as tolerable. This process, if YDOM Syros or inspectors quickly check “fixes”, it may not take many days.

But it is not known whether, in both the Principote and Nammos cases, the affiliation claims are accompanied by a survey (so that the inspectors have something to check). This is due to the fact that the measures arbitrarily gave successive extensions to engineers who take over the legalization of the filing of accompanying documents. As a result, the authorities can only receive a report of square meters and scribbles.

The Central Council for Urban Planning decided that the protocol for the opening of most violations would be finalized.

How will his case end? Principot; In principle, the company can challenge and stop in court any stage of the process. As other demolition cases in the past have shown, it is common for motions for temporary injunctive relief to be filed to “freeze” the process even on the day the demolition is scheduled.

The same can be done with a fine, so tracking can be long. The decisive point, however, is whether the operating license will be revoked by the municipality of Mykonos. The municipality is required by law to do so as soon as it is notified of the final autopsy report. Only in this way (and, of course, with the help of the police) can it be ensured that the business does not … restore what it destroyed, as it was in the past (see “K” 3.4.23).

Nammos

His business Nammos was a different fate. First of all, in the morning in the Tripartite Court of Appeal of Athens, the application of the leaders of the enterprise for the issuance of a temporary injunction was considered. At the request of lawyers, the trial will continue on Monday. Nammos’s application was not considered in KESYPOTHA because there is no provision for an appeal to KESYPOTHA at this stage of the process. Recall that inspectors at the autopsy recorded work in progress without a license, while business representatives claimed that the building they were working on was “clean” and the work was not of a structural nature.

Everything shows that if government wishes to arbitrarily demolish Mykonos within the next week, he has no choice but to look for old demolition protocols (which were in place for years but were not implemented due to a two-year moratorium on beach demolitions that expired at the end of March ).