The next election will not be a purely ideological battle, he predicted. President of SYRIZA V interview which he handed over to the Alfa TV channel. “The key stakes in this election are about people’s lives,” he said. In affirming, the President of SYRIZA added that “the battle was more ideological in 2019. There were national questions on the table, the Macedonian question with our differences. Now the bet is again on the social, on survival and democracy.” The official leader of the opposition spoke of “elections with big surprises” to be decided by those who go to the polls, pointing to his party’s great youth dominance.

Review

Mr Tsipras argued that “sudden elections” are coming, to be decided by whoever ends up going to the polls.

OUR Alexis Tsipras launched an attack on the government over a lump sum pensioner’s allowance. He talked about the old party logic.

Kumundur’s strategy lately has been to criticize the government’s advantages by contrasting its program SYRIZA. Regarding the auctions and the decision of the Supreme Court, he noted: “We will restore the security of the first residence. First, we will establish a regulatory framework. It is not currently possible for servicers who have bought a securitized loan for 15% of the cost to want to return 100% through the process of auctions and pressure. This cannot be done. We are not saying that guarantees should expire. To have a reasonable profit. But it should be possible to prioritize agreements through a simple platform with criteria that will be widely accepted.” He added that for those who are not subject to this procedure, it should be possible to go to court, as in the case of the Katseli law. A detailed program will be presented in the coming days.

In an attempt to close the conflict he had begun with PASOK, Mr. Tsipras pointed out that in the question of wiretapping, Nikos Androulakis showed that he was not being blackmailed. “He raised the issue, appealed to the European Court, filed lawsuits. Others are those who made the “duck”. Ministers of the New Democracy”. However, he made it clear that he politically disagrees with the fact that he does not exclude cooperation with the “New Democracy”, which established surveillance of him.